In re E.A.-1, J.A., Jr., and E.A.-2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to grant a continuance due to the fact that one of the defendant’s key witnesses could not appear at trial because of the untimely death of the witness’s father
• reversing weapons conviction where defendant was denied continuance to secure attendance of material witness who had left town to attend funeral
• listing “the diligence of the [requesting] party” as a 2 The district court was clear that it was dismissing “[t]he case . . . with prejudice,” not just her still-pending retaliation claim. (Emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).