In re Dunnhell Suspender & Belt Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that court need not review an application for attorneys’ fees with heightened level of scrutiny where, as here, parties have contracted for an award of fees which will not be paid from common fund
• noting that service awards in the amounts of $25,000 and $35,000 “fall solidly in the middle of the range” of “incentive awards given generally to named plaintiffs across a variety of class actions”
• awarding either $750 or $1000 per claimant, depending upon the number of times the prisoner was searched
• noting that service awards in the amounts of $25,000 and $35,000
• approving incentive awards ranging from $25,000 to $30,000 as “falling] solidly in the middle of the range” of those approved “across a variety of class actions”
• stating incentive awards of $ 25,000 are “solidly in the middle of the range”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).