In Re Dunnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court properly conducted a de novo review of a development review board's decision when the Town of Ludlow did not satisfy the third requirement of § 4471(b)
• holding that this Court properly conducted a de novo review of a development review board’s decision when the Town of Ludlow did not satisfy the third requirement of Section 4471(b)
• stating that this Court will not address issues on appeal that are not briefed
• summarizing the requirements a municipality must fulfill to have appeals from its DRB determinations be “on-the-record” and comparing the difference of such proceedings and de novo appeals.
• denying a variance because a reasonable use of the property existed without it
• denying a variance because a reasonable use of the property existed without it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).