Skip to main content
· 1/14/2008

In Re Dunmore Homes, Inc.

Citations

  • 380 B.R. 663
  • 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 44
  • 49 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 90

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the moving parties had met their burden under both the interests of justice and convenience of parties’ standards
  • holding that the moving parties had met their burden under both the interests of justice and convenience of parties’ standards
  • concluding that judicial economy was best served by transferring a debtor’s case to California where several state court eases were pending against the debtor’s subsidiaries and many issues in the cases would be governed by California law
  • “The decision to transfer venue is within the discretion of the court, as evidenced by the use of the permissive ‘may’ in § 1412.”
  • “The decision to transfer venue is within the discretion of the court, as evidenced by the use of the permissive ‘may’ in § 1412.”
  • “The decision to transfer venue is within the discretion of the court, as evidenced by the use of the permissive ‘may’ in § 1412.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin Glenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.