· 1/14/2008
In Re Dunmore Homes, Inc.
Citations
- 380 B.R. 663
- 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 44
- 49 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the moving parties had met their burden under both the interests of justice and convenience of parties’ standards
- holding that the moving parties had met their burden under both the interests of justice and convenience of parties’ standards
- concluding that judicial economy was best served by transferring a debtor’s case to California where several state court eases were pending against the debtor’s subsidiaries and many issues in the cases would be governed by California law
- “The decision to transfer venue is within the discretion of the court, as evidenced by the use of the permissive ‘may’ in § 1412.”
- “The decision to transfer venue is within the discretion of the court, as evidenced by the use of the permissive ‘may’ in § 1412.”
- “The decision to transfer venue is within the discretion of the court, as evidenced by the use of the permissive ‘may’ in § 1412.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin Glenn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.