Skip to main content

In re D.R.

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 539

Syllabus

Judgment reversed. The trial court's judgment granting the agency's motion for permanent custody was against the manifest weight of the evidence and not supported by clear and convincing evidence, because the court relied on incorrect facts regarding father's criminal convictions in assessing the child's best interests. Case remanded for trial court to properly analyze the R.C. 2151.414(D)(1) best interest factors, father's remaining arguments rendered moot.

Judges: Edelstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.