Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/27/2018

In re D.R.

Citations

2018 Ohio 3434
117 N.E.3d 1075

Syllabus

The trial court's decision to grant the Agency's motion for permanent custody of Appellants' child was supported by the manifest weight of the evidence. The record establishes that the Agency use reasonable case planning and diligent efforts to reunite Appellants with their child and accommodate Appellants' developmental disabilities.

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

In re Dn.R.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-21· cited 12×
State v. Fensler
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-28

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
State v. Schiebel
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
Miller v. Miller
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-06-01· cited 1,173×
In re Adoption of Holcomb
Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-08-07· cited 1,100×
In re Schaefer
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
In re Estate of Haynes
Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-07-23· cited 380×
In re K.H.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
In re C.W.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 212×
In Re B.C.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-16· cited 193×
In re R.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-14· cited 86×
In re H.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-03· cited 48×
In re A.F.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-19· cited 43×
In re S.D.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-26· cited 12×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.