In re Doyle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• original claims held invalid under section 112 during reissue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
  Federal Circuit· 1989-10-06· cited 117×
• Digital Equipment Corporation v. Sidney A. Diamond, Etc.
  First Circuit· 1981-06-12· cited 35×
• In Re Robert C. Sneed and Joseph C. Young, and E-Z Lay Pipe Corp. And Stream Line, Inc., Intervenors
  Federal Circuit· 1983-06-27· cited 29×
• In re Lipitor Antitrust Litigation
  D. New Jersey· 2014-09-12· cited 10×
• In re Albrecht
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1975-05-01· cited 7×
• In re Willis
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1976-07-09· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Application of Walter D. Bernhart and William A. Fetter
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1969-11-20· cited 39×
• Application of Hugo Ghiron and Werner Ulrich
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1971-05-20· cited 23×
• Application of Paul J. Naquin, Jr
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1968-07-03· cited 15×