In re Downie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the PCR court erred when it required petitioner to prove that it was more likely than not that he would have received a different sentence
• reversing and remanding where post-conviction court applied the incorrect legal standard—as evidenced by “the post-conviction court’s statements on the record” and quoting the court’s “explanation of its ruling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).