Skip to main content
· 7/28/1988

In Re Douglas Ewing, M.D. And Patricia Ewing. Walter M. Dickinson, Trustee v. Douglas Ewing, M.D. And Patricia Ewing

Citations

  • 852 F.2d 1057
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10021
  • 1988 WL 77061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that res judicata was improperly applied because appeal was pending, and noting, “It is well established in the federal courts that the pendency of an appeal does not diminish Denial of Yard Time (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 71-74) with Karsjens TAC ¶ 138(e-k
  • rejecting argument that res judicata was improperly applied because appeal was pending, and noting, “It is well established in the federal courts that the pendency of an appeal does not diminish Denial of Yard Time (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 71-74) with Karsjens TAC ¶ 138(e-k

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Beam, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.