In Re Douglas Dunhill, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failure to establish a party knew of the contract or of the contract’s terms requires dismissal of tortious interference claim
• failure to establish that a party knew of the contract or of the contract’s terms subjects a tortious interference claim’s dismissal
• failure to establish that a party knew of the contract or of the contract’s terms subjects a tortious interference claim’s dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• R.E. Davis Chemical Corp. v. Diasonics, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1987-08-13· cited 28×
• RKI, Inc. v. Grimes
  N.D. Illinois· 2002-05-03· cited 6×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1987-09-10

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• W. P. Iverson & Co. v. Dunham Manufacturing Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1958-09-29· cited 55×
• Candalaus Chicago, Inc. v. Evans Mill Supply Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-06-10· cited 38×
• Stevenson v. ITT Harper, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-07-26· cited 34×
• Blivas & Page, Inc. v. Klein
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-04-27· cited 25×
• Mitchell v. Weiger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-07-31· cited 21×
• Swager v. Couri
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-23· cited 16×
• Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1969-02-07· cited 13×
• Farley v. Kissell Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-02-22· cited 5×