California Court of Appeal· 10/27/2011

In re Douglas

Citations

200 Cal. App. 4th 236
132 Cal. Rptr. 3d 582
2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that federal standard \is neither current nor controlling\ and that court would instead apply \a broader conception of laches used in California\
holding that federal standard “is neither current nor controlling” and that court would instead apply “a broader conception of laches used in California”
holding that federal standard “is neither current nor controlling” and that court would instead apply “a broader conception of laches used in California”
same, noting \difficulty of retrial in the event that a judgment is set aside on habeas corpus many years after the conviction\
same, noting “difficulty of retrial in the event that a judgment is set aside on habeas corpus many years after the conviction”
\[T]he People have been prejudiced both with regard to retrying Defendant and to responding to issues raised in Defendant's petition.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollenhorst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.