In re Doskey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that a \third party complaint must allege facts sufficient to establish at least four separate elements in order to maintain a common law action for indemnity\
• reviewing alternate grounds for affirmance that were raised in trial court even though trial court failed to rule on claims
• reviewing alternative grounds for affirmance that were raised in trial court even though trial court failed to rule on claims
• when trial court does not rule on merits of alternate grounds, we retain discretion to consider those grounds on appeal
• appellate court ‘‘may affirm the court’s judgment on a dispositive alternat[ive] ground for which there is support in the trial court record’’
• common-law indemnity appropriate where (1) third-party defendant was negligent; (2) third-party defendant’s negligence, rather than defendants’ negligence, was the direct, immediate cause of the accident and injuries; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).