In Re Donald Foster v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of nomination petitions by independent candidates is a procedure that \must pass muster against the charges of discrimination or of abridgment of the right to vote\
• holding that the use of nomination petitions by independent candidates is a procedure, that “must pass muster against the charges of discrimination or of abridgment of the right to vote”
• holding that election law challenge was not moot “as long as [the state] maintains [its] present [laws]”
• holding that candidates' challenge to a statutory signature requirement was not moot once the election had been held because the burden \placed on the nomination of candidates for statewide offices remain[ed] and control[led] future elections\
• holding that the independent candidates' challenge to Illinois's ballot access signature requirement was not moot without explicitly addressing the likelihood that the same independent candidates would seek to run again
• holding that the independent candidates’ challenge to Illinois’s ballot access signature requirement was not moot without explicitly addressing the likelihood that the same independent candidates would seek to run again

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).