Illinois Supreme Court· 5/18/2006
In re Donald A.G.
Citations
- 221 Ill. 2d 234
- 850 N.E.2d 172
- 302 Ill. Dec. 735
- 2006 Ill. LEXIS 622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting a court is not bound by the literal language of the statute if it would lead to absurd or unjust results not contemplated
- “[W]e are not bound by the literal language *** if that language produces absurd or unjust results not contemplated by the legislature.”
- this court took judicial notice of Rule 23 order in underlying criminal case
- “Although section 1(D) of the Adoption Act sets forth numerous grounds under which a parent may be deemed ‘unfit,’ any one ground, properly proven, is sufficient to enter a finding of unfitness.”
- “Although section 1(D) of the Adoption Act sets forth numerous grounds under which a parent may be deemed ‘unfit,’ any one ground, properly proven, is sufficient to enter a finding of unfitness.”
- “Although section 1(D) of the Adoption Act sets forth numerous grounds under which a parent may be - 14 - deemed ‘unfit,’ any one ground, properly proven, is sufficient to enter a finding of unfitness.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- O'Casek v. Children's Home & Aid SocietyIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-06-19· cited 212×
- Krautsack v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-12-21· cited 180×
- Tri-G, Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & WeaverIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 177×
- Adames v. SheahanIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-03-19· cited 131×
- J.S.A. v. M.H.Illinois Supreme Court· 2007-02-01· cited 110×
- Millennium Park Joint Venture, LLC v. HoulihanIllinois Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 107×
- Citizens Opposing Pollution v. Exxonmobil Coal U.S.A.Illinois Supreme Court· 2012-02-02· cited 66×
- Hadley v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-02-16· cited 59×
- People v. LeachAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-05-31· cited 52×
- Kaider v. HamosAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-07-20· cited 44×
- Maddux v. BlagojevichIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 40×
- In re D.D.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2022-08-22· cited 39×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-20· cited 33×
- People ex rel. Illinois Department of Corrections v. HawkinsIllinois Supreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 31×
- People v. McNealAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-11-24· cited 30×
- People v. SparksAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-08-14· cited 27×
- In Re Janira T.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-12· cited 24×
- Jsa v. MhIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-02-01· cited 21×
- Alvarez v. PappasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-06-04· cited 21×
- People v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-07-20· cited 19×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Detention of LiebermanIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-07-03· cited 254×
- People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court· 2005-05-19· cited 239×
- Fumarolo v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 231×
- People v. Rosanna W.Illinois Supreme Court· 2002-03-21· cited 190×
- People v. Lashawn F.Illinois Supreme Court· 2003-12-18· cited 113×
- Stalder v. StoneIllinois Supreme Court· 1952-05-22· cited 105×
- People Ex Rel. Cason v. RingIllinois Supreme Court· 1968-11-22· cited 97×
- Gill v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 76×
- In Re AbdullahIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 67×
- People v. Edwin Aadil J.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-03-29· cited 13×
- People v. GaylordAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-06-10· cited 4×
Other cases named In re Donald A.G.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.