In re Donald A.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a court is not bound by the literal language of the statute if it would lead to absurd or unjust results not contemplated
• “[W]e are not bound by the literal language *** if that language produces absurd or unjust results not contemplated by the legislature.”
• this court took judicial notice of Rule 23 order in underlying criminal case
• “Although section 1(D) of the Adoption Act sets forth numerous grounds under which a parent may be deemed ‘unfit,’ any one ground, properly proven, is sufficient to enter a finding of unfitness.”
• “Although section 1(D) of the Adoption Act sets forth numerous grounds under which a parent may be deemed ‘unfit,’ any one ground, properly proven, is sufficient to enter a finding of unfitness.”
• “Although section 1(D) of the Adoption Act sets forth numerous grounds under which a parent may be - 14 - deemed ‘unfit,’ any one ground, properly proven, is sufficient to enter a finding of unfitness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).