Skip to main content

In Re Doe

Citations

  • 19 S.W.3d 346
  • 43 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 910
  • 2000 Tex. LEXIS 67
  • 2000 WL 827814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \courts construing statutory language should give little weight to post-enactment statements by legislators\
  • noting that post-enactment statements by legislators are given very little weight, and do not constitute legislative history for the purposes of determining legislative intent
  • noting that “courts construing statutory language should give little weight to post-enactment statements by legislators”
  • “‘courts construing statutory language should give little weight to post-enactment statements by legislators”‘
  • courts construing statutory language should give little weight to post-enactment statements by legislators; explanations produced, after fact, by individual legislators are not statutory history and can provide little guidance as to what legislature collectively intended
  • courts construing statutory language should give little weight to post- enactment statements by legislators; explanations produced, after fact, by individual legislators are not statutory history and can provide little guidance as to what legislature collectively intended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Neill, Enoch, Baker, Hankinson, Gonzales, Hecht, Owen, Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.