· 11/4/2013
In re Diventura
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 550
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 396
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3258
- 571 U.S. 989
- 2013 WL 5594743
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7812
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court may consider a res judicata defense on a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss
- deciding that plaintiff need not be given leave to amend if he fails to specify how amendment would cure the pleading deficiencies in his complaint
- holding that infringement claim is not barred by res judicata because new instances of infringement had occurred after the settlement
- deciding that the plaintiff need not be given leave to amend if he fails to specify how amendment would cure the pleading deficiencies in his complaint
- deciding that the plaintiff need not be given leave to amend if she fails to specify how amendment would cure the pleading deficiencies in her complaint
- deciding that the plaintiff need not be given leave to amend if he fails to specify how amendment would cure the pleading deficiencies in his complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.