Skip to main content
· 7/7/2020

In Re: Discipline Of Matthew S. Dunkley

Citations

  • 466 P.3d 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nothing in applicable Arizona law requires 22 a drafter to explain the provisions of standardized contracts, nor does the post-hoc regret 23 of a party to such a contract suffice to demonstrate unconscionability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.