In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Heath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the requirements of OCGA § 24-8-820 were met, the trial court did not err by admitting the victim’s out-of-court statement to a police officer about the appellant’s sexual abuse of the victim
• applying a Stonaker progeny and no plain- error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).