In Re Disciplinary Action Against Wentzel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 30 instances of misappropriation over 2 years aggravated the severity of the misconduct
• noting that misappropriation of client funds “reflects poorly on the entire legal profession and erodes the public’s confidence in lawyers”
• finding that “the mitigating factors do not outweigh the aggravating factors found by the referee” and imposing disbarment in a misappropriation case despite the existence of four mitigating factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).