In re Disbarment Proceedings against Gutierrez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no ability to cure when opposing party given only eleven minutes to prepare cross-examination of surprise witness
• explaining that “even with the help of his [or her] own experts,” an attorney “frequently cannot anticipate the particular approach [an] adversary’s expert will take” (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 advisory committee’s note to 1970 amendment)
• reversing $800,000 jury verdict where the plaintiff’s medical expert’s testimony exceeded the scope of the designation and summary
• reversing $800,000 jury verdict where the plaintiff’s medical expert’s testimony exceeded the scope of the designation and summary
• applying the factors to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in allowing testimony from a witness not listed in the pretrial order
• construing Fed. R. Civ. P. 703 and 705, identical to ER 703 and 705

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).