Skip to main content
· 3/9/1981

In re Disbarment of Wolf

Citations

  • 450 U.S. 977
  • 101 S. Ct. 1508
  • 67 L. Ed. 2d 811
  • 49 U.S.L.W. 3663
  • 1981 U.S. LEXIS 1185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining a party must assert its claim of work product protection on a document-by-document basis and may not rely upon a blanket claim for privilege for an entire category of documents
  • under Upjohn, there is no principled basis for distinguishing consultant’s communications with attorneys and corporate employee’s communications with attorneys when each acted in the scope of their employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.