In re Disbarment of Halverson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “discovery need not be required of documents of public record which are equally accessible to all parties,” but denying a party’s motion to exclude public “records of which it was aware and which it had authority to obtain”
• denying motion to compel production of pleadings and Court No. 23-00046 Page 33 discovery filed with the court in another litigation that were available to the public
• declining as a matter of comity and respect for another federal court to modify a protective order issued by the other court and instead requiring the party seeking the modification to first go to the issuing court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).