In re Disbarment of Donnelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding tire prosecutor’s reference to defense counsel as a “know-it-all” and “Mr. Thorough” were permissible inferences based on evidence and arguments presented and not misconduct
• holding the prosecutor's reference to defense counsel as a \know-it-all\ and \Mr. Thorough\ were permissible inferences based on evidence and arguments presented and not misconduct
• trial court did not err by declining to sequester government's case agent under Rule 615
• no error for prosecutor to comment in summation on a “defendant’s failure to call witnesses to support his arguments” or failure to cross-examine a witness about a subject; court’s instructions to jury obviated any prosecutorial error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).