In Re Directives Pursuant to SEC. 105b

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “more appropriate consideration” is whether “programmatic purpose of the surveillances ... involves some legitimate objective beyond ordinary crime control”
• recognizing that executive was more protective than PAA required in conducting warrantless surveillance under that statute
• recognizing that executive was more protective than PAA required in conducting warrantless surveillance under that statute
• holding that the provider had standing and that the directives were constitutional
• noting that, in reviewing constitutional challenge to PAA, FISA court \handed down a meticulous opinion\
• noting that, in reviewing constitutional challenge to PAA, FISA court “handed down a meticulous opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).