Skip to main content
· 3/31/2003

In Re Dippin' Dots Patent Litigation

Citations

  • 249 F. Supp. 2d 1346
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8516
  • 2002 WL 32072485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since Defendants’ process produces beads and irregularly shaped particles of ice cream, Defendants’ method does not literally infringe the '156 patent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thrash

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.