Skip to main content
· 11/6/1991

In Re Digital Equipment Corporation E. Joseph Dean

Citations

  • 949 F.2d 228
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 463
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26468
  • 1991 WL 226835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appeal of District of South Dakota’s ruling on subpoenas issued by District of Oregon
  • “Upon service of the written objection, the deposing party shall not be entitled to inspect and copy the materials identified in the subpoena, except pursuant to an order of the court from which the subpoena was issued.”
  • using \transfer” and \remit” interchangeably

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Gibson, Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.