In Re Diel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a provision by Vermont’s Human Services Board, which resulted in a denial of welfare benefits to certain persons, was invalid, because it had not been adopted as a rule
• noting that Department of Social Welfare's change of policy would be invalid if it constituted rulemaking
• noting that Department of Social Welfare’s change of policy would be invalid if it constituted rulemaking
• holding agency adoption and subsequent rescission of policy change affecting calculation of welfare benefits invalid for failure to promulgate pursuant to VAPA
• noting that issues of due process were outside of the Human Services Board’s expertise
• noting that issues of due process were outside of the Human Services Board’s expertise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).