Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/20/2018

In re D.H.

Citations

2018 Ohio 630

Syllabus

JUVENILE - TERMINATION PARENTAL RIGHTS - undisputed evidence establishes that children were in the custody of the agency for 12 of the 22 months before the motion for permanent custody was filed appellate court need not address alternative grounds for the trial court's decision grant of custody to the agency was in the best interest of the children R.C. 2151.414(D).

Judges: Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

In re E.T.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-15· cited 11×
In re G.C.M.G.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-25· cited 5×
Hallisy v. Hallisy
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-21· cited 4×
In re C.N.L.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-20· cited 2×
In re J.L.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-02· cited 2×
In re H.N.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-29
In re V.J.P.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-24
In re A.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-25
Pirozzoli v. Thornton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
In re Hayes
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
In re Cunningham
Ohio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
In re the Interest of R. J. C.
District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-04-09· cited 118×
In re J.H.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-29· cited 47×
In re B.R.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-13· cited 9×
In re M.G.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-17· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.