In re Deutsch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding non-debtor contributions to expenses may be considered regular income where contributions have been made in the past.
• “Reliance on contributions from family is disfavored, but not prohibited.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: Stephen William Berkley
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-04-17
• In re: Rita Ramos Curiel
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-06-23
• In re: Jason M. Lee AND Janice Chen
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-11-13

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
  Supreme Court· 1915-02-23· cited 371×
• Meyer v. Hill (In Re Hill)
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-28· cited 50×
• In Re Antoine
  E.D. New York· 1997-03-31· cited 28×
• Rowe v. Conners (In Re Rowe)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-02-08· cited 28×
• In Re Norwood
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-03-03· cited 27×
• In Re Campbell
  E.D. New York· 1984-03-15· cited 27×
• In Re Fischel
  N.D. New York· 1989-04-07· cited 19×
• In Re Porter
  D. Massachusetts· 2002-04-22· cited 16×
• In Re SCHWALB
  D. Nevada· 2006-08-03· cited 15×
• In Re Murphy
  M.D. Tennessee· 1998-10-29· cited 12×
• In Re Sigfrid
  D. Minnesota· 1993-12-06· cited 11×
• In Re Varian
  D. Connecticut· 1988-11-01· cited 11×
• Santiago-Monteverde v. Pereira (In re Santiago-Monteverde)
  S.D. New York· 2014-06-27· cited 8×
• In Re Jordan
  D. Montana· 1998-10-16· cited 7×
• In Re Heck
  D. Kansas· 2006-10-24· cited 7×
• In re Loomis
  N.D. Oklahoma· 2013-02-25· cited 5×
• In Re Crowder
  E.D. Arkansas· 1995-03-22· cited 4×
• In re Andolino
  D. New Jersey· 2015-02-25· cited 4×