In Re Detention of Stout

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[i]t is well-settled that the Sixth Amendment right to confrontation is available only to criminal defendants.”
• holding because the SVP statute is civil, the accused has no right to confront witnesses
• holding because the SVP statute is civil, the accused has no right to confront witnesses
• affirming court of appeals decision upholding 2003 SVP commitment based on burglary that was sexually motivated
• affirming court of appeals decision upholding 2003 SVP commitment based on burglary that was sexually motivated
• applying test from Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335, 96 S. Ct. 893, 47 L. Ed. 2d 18 (1976)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).