Skip to main content
· 3/11/2010

In Re Detention of Pouncy

Citations

  • 229 P.3d 678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e also address the impeachment evidence issue because it is one that is likely to arise on retrial.”
  • an error which is trivial or merely academic is harmless and not prejudicial to the substantial rights of a party
  • “Where our evidence rules mirror their federal counterparts, we may look to federal case law interpreting the federal rules as persuasive authority in interpreting our own rules.”
  • “Trial courts must define technical words and expressions used injury instructions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.