In Re Detention of Isbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, even absent a limiting instruction, trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing State’s experts to testify about facts underlying the respondent’s sexual crimes where the experts testified that they relied upon those facts in forming their opinions
• finding that, even absent a limiting instruction, trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing State’s experts to testify about facts underlying the respondent’s sexual crimes where the experts testified that they relied upon those facts in forming their opinions
• finding that, even absent a limiting instruction, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing State’s expert witnesses to testify about facts underlying the respondent’s sexual crimes where the experts testified that they relied upon those facts in forming their opinions
• by observing what a large number of reoffenders have had in common, one can compile a list of risk factors
• by observing what a large number of reoffenders have had in common, one can compile a fist of risk factors
• by observing what a large number of reoffenders have had in common, one can compile a list of risk factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).