Skip to main content
· 4/9/2001

In Re Detention of Hayes

Citations

  • 747 N.E.2d 444
  • 321 Ill. App. 3d 178
  • 254 Ill. Dec. 404
  • 2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s interpretation of a portion of that state’s “similar statute” persuasive
  • finding the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s interpretation of a portion of that state’s “similar statute” persuasive
  • circuit court could not order DHS to employ a particular doctor to oversee respondent’s treatment
  • the definition of “substantially probable” cannot be reduced to a mere mathematical formula or statistical analysis
  • “under section 40(b)(3) a trial court is required to approve a treatment plan”
  • \under section 40(b)(3) a trial court is required to approve a treatment plan\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutchinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.