Skip to main content
· 6/12/2009

In Re DePugh

Citations

  • 409 B.R. 125
  • 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3080
  • 2009 WL 1657473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a decision from the District Court in the Southern District of Texas is binding on a Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas
  • Documents attached to proof of claim were insufficient, were hearsay, and no foundation was laid under the business records exception to permit entry of the documents into evidence.
  • “This Court does not believe that the Supreme Court contemplated that creditors could ignore Bankruptcy Rule 3001’s requirements unless and until a debtor complains and then cry ‘no harm no foul’ by producing documents that should have been produced to begin with.”
  • \This Court does not believe that the Supreme Court contemplated that creditors could ignore Bankruptcy Rule 3001's requirements unless and until a debtor complains and then cry 'no harm no foul' by producing documents that should have been produced to begin with.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jeff Bohm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.