In Re Dependency of TCCB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that termination statutes are not narrowly tailored because they do not require consideration of a dependency guardianship or an open adoption
• rejecting argument that termination statutes are not narrowly tailored because they do not require consideration of a dependency guardianship or an open adoption
• rejecting argument that termination statutes are not narrowly tailored because they do not require consideration of a 21 No. 76170-6-1 (Consol. with No. 76171-4-1)/22 dependency guardianship or an open adoption
• rejecting the argument that the termination statutes are not narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest because they do not require only that degree of regulation necessary to prevent harm
• where there is no dependency guardianship pending, there is no constitutional or other requirement to consider a “theoretical dependency proceeding”
• where there is no dependency guardianship pending, there is no constitutional or other requirement to consider a “theoretical dependency proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).