In Re Dependency of MSD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting orders of dependency must be supported by “substantial evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Dependency of Ca.R.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-08· cited 25×
• Kimberly Moehlmann v. Kelly M. Lambert
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-01· cited 9×
• In re the Welfare of: Ca. R.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-10-27

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• Smith v. Stillwell-Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 313×
• Hamilton v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-12-31· cited 81×
• In Re JF
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-12-31· cited 80×
• Milligan v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-15· cited 69×
• State v. Motherwell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-03-22· cited 66×
• D.P. v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-10-31· cited 51×
• In Re Dependency of SMH
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-07-06· cited 39×
• Department of Social & Health Services v. Hamm
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-16· cited 37×
• In Re the Welfare of Frederiksen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-08· cited 36×
• Davis v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-02-04· cited 30×