Skip to main content
· 6/13/2005

In Re Dependency of IJS

Citations

  • 114 P.3d 1215
  • 128 Wash. App. 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that the State must prove that dependency guardianship is not a viable alternative to termination, regardless of whether a dependency guardianship petition has been filed
  • The state has an obligation to intervene and protect a child from harm in a termination proceeding.
  • \[T]he termination statutes are narrowly drawn because the State must prove that the relationship with the parents harms or potentially harms the child before the court can terminate parental rights.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schindler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.