Skip to main content
· 3/6/1973

In re Department of Institutions & Agencies

Citations

  • 123 N.J. Super. 39
  • 301 A.2d 458
  • 1973 N.J. Super. LEXIS 592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he functions of the guardian ad litem and the attorney advocate are not sufficiently similar to allow one to ‘pinch hit’ for the other when the best interest of a juvenile is at stake.”
  • “[W]e must presume prejudice where, as here, a child was not represented by a guardian ad litem at a critical stage of the termination proceedings.”
  • “The functions of [GAL] and the attorney advocate are not sufficiently similar to allow one to ‘pinch hit’ for the other when the best interest of a juvenile is at stake.”
  • \The functions of the guardian ad litem and the attorney advocate are not sufficiently similar to allow one to `pinch hit' for the other when the best interest of a juvenile is at stake.\
  • “The functions of the guardian ad litem and the attorney advocate are not sufficiently similar to allow one to ‘pinch hit’ for the other when the best' interest of a juvenile is at stake.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Labeeoque

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.