In Re Delmarter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the defendants’ convictions in light of evidence tampering because the defendants confessed to possessing a controlled substance and there were positive field tests on the alleged controlled substance
• An independent field test and confession 30 No. 38278-8-III State v. Petek could support a conviction for possession of a controlled substance after lab tests were excluded due to the misconduct of a state chemist.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).