In Re Delgado
Citations
- 140 U.S. 586
- 11 S. Ct. 874
- 35 L. Ed. 578
- 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2487
Syllabus
<p>A Statute providing that “ for the purpose of hearing application for and issuing writs of mandamus,” the court “ shall be regarded-as open at all times ” authorizes a hearing on the réturn of the alternative writ, and the issue of a peremptory writ in vacation.</p> <p>A statute limiting the fine to be imposed for violation of a peremptory writ of mandamus, and providing that, when paid, it shall be a bar to an action for any penalty incurred by reason of refusal or neglect to perform the duty, does not deprive the court of power to punish for disobedience of the writ, or to compel obedience by imprisonment.</p> <p>In case of a disputed election to a municipal office, mandamus may issue to compel the recognition of the defacto officer until the rights of the parties can be determined on quo warranto.</p>
Judges: Brewer, Bbadley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SammonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1982-05-24· cited 69×
- Kaizo v. HenrySupreme Court· 1908-11-16· cited 61×
- Jaramillo v. State Ex Rel. Board of County Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1926-10-15· cited 3×
- In re Gonzales y BorregoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1896-09-25· cited 3×
- United States ex rel. Jones v. City of West Palm BeachFifth Circuit· 1938-01-27· cited 2×
- Eldodt v. Territory of New Mexico ex rel. VaughnNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1900-05-03· cited 1×
- Hawke v. McAllisterArizona Supreme Court· 1894-01-11
- Bash v. HowaldSupreme Court· 1917-06-11
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.