In re Delaware Steel Fabricating Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a class of 40 has been deemed sufficient to satisfy this requirement
• plaintiffs’ claim that notice of right to cancel misstated the scope of the plaintiffs’ rescission rights satisfied the predominance requirement of Rule 23
• “The fact that [plaintiff], if she prevails, may rescind her loan while other plaintiffs may not creates no conflict because all she is seeking in this action is a declaration of the right to rescind.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).