In re Deckert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of an appellant’s initial refusal to undergo a urine test was improper, notwithstanding the state’s implied consent law, because “the California deputy did not follow the terms of the California implied consent statute”
• finding no exigent circumstances when methamphetamine use can be detected by a urine test \some 24 to 48 hours after consumption of the drug\
• finding no exigent circumstances when methamphetamine use can be detected by a urine test “some 24 to 48 hours after consumption of the drug”
• \We take judicial notice that urine tests indicates methamphetamine use some 24 to 48 hours after consumption of the drug.\
• “We take judicial notice that urine tests indicates methamphetamine use some 24 to 48 hours after consumption of the drug.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).