Skip to main content
· 8/29/2006

In Re: Deborah Alice Neal, Debtor, Deborah Alice Neal Unnamed Creditor, No. 1 Unnamed Creditor, No. 2 Unnamed Creditor No. 3 v. The Kansas City Star

Citations

  • 461 F.3d 1048
  • 31 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 721
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 22081
  • 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 278
  • 2006 WL 2472751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “unintended, potential secondary consequence of negative publicity . . . is regrettable but not a basis for sealing the filing”
  • explaining that the key question is “whether the party seeking to prevent disclosure has overcome the common-law right of access”
  • describing the right to public records as presumptively attaching absent “compelling reasons [to] justify nondisclosure”
  • explaining the presumption of access to judicial records in a bankruptcy context
  • employing a test to determine if a matter is scandalous by asking “ ‘whether a reasonable person could alter their opinion of Defendants based on the statements therein, taking those statements in the context in which they appear’ ”
  • “[t]he unintended, potential secondary consequence of negative publicity . . . is regrettable but not a basis for sealing [a] filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Heaney, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.