In Re De Hertogh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that chapter 7 debtors’ malpractice claim against bankruptcy attorney for failure to advise the debtors as to certain matters that “caused them to lose the $150,000 homestead exemption to which they would have otherwise have been entitled” was not property of the estate
• ‘‘the [c]ourt’s analysis focuses on when [prepetition or postpetition] and to whom [the estate or the postpeti- tion debtor] a legally cognizable interest in the cause of action arose under the applicable state law’’ [emphasis omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).