In Re DD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• as a matter of law, trial courts possess the authority to determine the proper disposition of a delinquent, and nothing in the Juvenile Court Act specifically restrains it from making specific placements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re OH
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-04-18· cited 7×
• In Re KC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-10-09· cited 6×
• In Re DD
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-09-30

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-03-29· cited 1,536×
• Chiara C. v. Department of Children & Family Services
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-04-16· cited 30×
• People v. T.L.C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-12-27· cited 17×
• Schanowitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-11-02· cited 14×
• Cranston v. L.R.B.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-04-12· cited 14×
• People v. M.P.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-30· cited 13×
• Matter of Adoption of LRB
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-04-12· cited 12×
• In re D. D.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-04-19· cited 10×
• Schanowitz v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-11-02· cited 9×
• In Re TLC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-12-27· cited 9×
• In Interest of MP
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-30· cited 5×