Skip to main content

In re D.C.H.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 4945

Syllabus

APPELLATE REVIEW – JURISDICTION – FINAL ORDER – JUV.R. 40: The appeal must be dismissed for lack of a final appealable order because the juvenile court's entry did not \enter a judgment\ as required by Juv.R. 40(D)(4)(e) where, despite ruling on the objection and rejecting the magistrate's decision, the entry did not apprise the parties of their rights and responsibilities without reference to a separate document as the juvenile court's entry stated that father's visitation reverted back to an earlier visitation order, but failed to delineate the particulars of that visitation.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.