In re D.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “there is no evidence supporting [mother’s] contention that the [guardians] will misuse their discretion to improperly prevent [mother] from visiting her daughter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re A.G.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-06-01· cited 14×
• In Re DB
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-07-28
• In re A.R.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-06-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-01-31· cited 771×
• Monroe v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-18· cited 120×
• Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-10-12· cited 93×
• In re J.D.C.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-07-03· cited 83×
• In Re Ko. W.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-06-07· cited 35×
• In re D.M.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-04-12· cited 24×
• United Retail Cleaners & Tailors Ass'n v. Denahan
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1945-10-04· cited 18×
• Faggins v. Fischer
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-06-03· cited 16×
• Singer v. Singer
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-12-14· cited 16×