In Re Db

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting North Carolina does not have a “stop and identify” statute and holding that during a Terry stop, an officer is not permitted to search for a person’s identification in order to protect himself or to seize an identification card, but may ask for identification
• noting North Carolina does not -25- have a \stop and identify\ statute and holding that during a Terry stop, an officer is not permitted to search for a person's identification in order to protect himself or to seize an identification card, but may ask for identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: J.K.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-04-18· cited 8×
• In re: J.K.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-04-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Adams v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
• Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-21· cited 884×
• Steen v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 2001-02-20· cited 64×
• In Re MS
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2009-08-18· cited 7×
• State v. Martinez
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2003-08-21· cited 6×