In re D.B.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1371
Syllabus
Failure to file transcript; App.R. 9; presume regularity; court not obligated to address case law about undisputed issue; Civ.R. 53; magistrate's decision; additional evidence; App.R. 12; App.R. 16; error must be separately argued; award of past-care support; R.C. 3111.13. The trial court did not err in declining to specifically address the case law raised by appellants or the affidavits presented in support of their objections to the magistrate's decision. The court further did not err in finding that appellant had not demonstrated that he was entitled to past-care support.
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 2,064×
- State ex rel. Fuller v. MengelOhio Supreme Court· 2003-12-24· cited 143×
- State ex rel. Neil v. French (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-07-11· cited 101×
- Pietrantano v. PietrantanoOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 17×
- Ernsberger v. ErnsbergerOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-09· cited 10×
- Djurin v. GinleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-30· cited 8×
- Van Dress Law Offices Co., L.L.C. v. DawsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-05· cited 6×
- Martin v. Cuyahoga Cty. ProsecutorOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-05· cited 4×
- Duncan v. BartoneOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.