In re Dawson
Citations
- 20 Idaho 178
- 117 P. 696
- 1911 Ida. LEXIS 88
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law — Trial by Jury — Waiver—Sufficiency of Information — How Raised.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the court.)</p> <p>1. Under the provisions of see. 7 of art. 1 of the constitution of this state, the right of trial by jury is reserved to the citizens of the state as it existed and was permitted under the common law, and such right is retained in all cases which were triable by jury under the common law, and limits the power of the court and of the citizens to a waiver of a jury trial to criminal cases not amounting to a felony, and then only by consent of both parties expressed in open court.</p> <p>2. The word “trial,” as used in see. 7, art. 1 of the constitution, means an issue of fact presented by a plea of the accused, and the court is without jurisdiction to try such issue of fact, if the charge be a felony, and there can be no conviction except upon trial by jury; but where the accused, with full knowledge of his constitutional rights, enters a plea of guilty, and presents no issue of fact for trial, there can be no trial and the conviction is the accused’s admission, and takes the place of a verdict of a jury.</p> <p>3. Whether it is necessary to allege in an information charging lareeny from the person the value of the property taken is a question of the sufdcieney of the information, and does not go to the jurisdiction of the court, and the only manner in which such question can be raised is by demurrer to the information, at the trial under the plea of not guilty, or after the trial in arrest of judgment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘We are of the opinion, therefore, that the plea of guilty in this ease was a sufficient conviction of the accused, and that the court had jurisdiction to impose the penalty prescribed by the statute for the offense charged”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ailshie, Stewart, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 170×
- State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court· 1952-07-10· cited 34×
- State v. RuttenIdaho Supreme Court· 1952-06-11· cited 25×
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Iowa· 1971-10-13· cited 23×
- Application of MartinIdaho Supreme Court· 1955-02-08· cited 22×
- Donnelly v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1950-11-29· cited 16×
- United States v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-01-25· cited 12×
- State v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 11×
- Ex Parte KingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1929-02-09· cited 11×
- State v. ScaliseMontana Supreme Court· 1957-04-11· cited 7×
- State Ex Rel. Eastman v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court· 1965-07-21· cited 5×
- State v. MartinezIdaho Supreme Court· 1965-07-22· cited 5×
- State v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court· 2022-05-03
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court· 1898-04-25· cited 472×
- People v. LennoxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1885-06-04· cited 33×
- State v. LockwoodWisconsin Supreme Court· 1877-08-15· cited 31×
- State v. MaineSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1858-03-15· cited 26×
- State v. AlmySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1892-06-05· cited 25×
- State v. SimonsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1900-05-05· cited 17×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1900-11-15· cited 15×
- State v. HinckleyIdaho Supreme Court· 1895-11-22· cited 11×
- In re AlcornIdaho Supreme Court· 1900-03-23· cited 10×
- West v. GammonSixth Circuit· 1899-12-04· cited 10×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1901-11-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.